19th Jan 12
Direct Line and Churchill fined 2.1m by FSA
by Natasha Redman
Churchill and Direct Line, the insurance arm of the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), have been handed a fine of £2.1m by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) for breaching regulations on handling complaints by customers.
The fine could have been £1m higher if it hadn’t been for the fact that the RBS had co-operated with the City regulator’s investigation, which was launched after files sent to the FSA by the insurance business were discovered to have been improperly tampered with, in some cases with fraudulent signatures.
The complaints files were being reviewed by the FSA and, following a tip off, it was found that of the 50 files which the regulator had requested, 27 had been tampered with. While the alterations were small-scale and had no affect on customers, the regulator took the offences seriously.
The FSA’s acting director of enforcement and financial crime Tracey McDermott said the issue had been a “serious breach” of the regulations, and the firms’ effort to make sure that the FSA was provided with complete files backfired.
Ms McDermott explained that the firms did not give clear instructions, which resulted in employees making inappropriate changes, with one member of staff even forging colleagues’ signatures. She revealed that the firms’ management was unaware of the alterations which had been made or when they occurred.
She went on to say that, in this case, the changes did not impact the FSA’s ability to do its job, but that the significant penalty is intended to underscore to companies that it is vital that material handed to the FSA reflects the true picture, not what they want it to be.
RBS is preparing to sell the insurance firms, best known for Direct Line’s red telephone and the nodding dog on Churchill’s TV advertisement, next year in order to meet European Union regulations covering the taxpayer bailout of £45bn handed to the bank.
RBS Insurance’s chief executive Paul Geddes said that he regretted the incident, adding that although no customers were affected, they are very disappointed that they were unable to meet the standards they expect of themselves and which are expected by the FSA.
The problems arose when the FSA told Churchill and Direct Line that it planned to review how effectively customer complaints were being handled. The companies asked accountants to go over a sample and discovered that 28 per cent of the reviewed files did not meet the required standards. Staff were told that if this action continued they would risk enforcement.
In April 2010, 50 files were sent out to be formally reviewed by the FSA, which had received a tip that some had been tampered with. Of the 50 files, 27 had been altered before being sent to the FSA, while seven internal documents were discovered to contain forged signatures by one employee.
Our Stories
- Sandwich labels misleading shoppers
- Unemployment drops unexpectedly but worse still to come
- Tesco store managers see annual bonuses cut
- Royal Mail: half London sorting office to be sold
- Panasonic announces £3.4bn loss
- Thomas Cook attacks government over holidays at home promotion
- Clinton Cards falls into administration
- Wet April sees high street spending fall
- Five tough years ahead for UK jobs market
- Deal struck to save Thomas Cook
- Discount battle leads to sales decline at Morrisons
- Wetherspoon founder: pubs plans to be hit by taxes
Popular Topics
afghanistan al qaeda amazon Apple ASDA bank of england barack obama BBC british airways china david cameron Debenhams Egypt facebook george osborne Google India ipad iphone ivory coast japan Libya London M&S Marks & Spencer Morrisons nhs North Korea Office for National Statistics pakistan protests russia Sainsbury’s South Korea terrorism Tesco Tunisia UK UK retailers UK retail news UK shopping us Waitrose Wikileaks x factorArchive
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- January 2009



