20th Apr 11
Apple asks judge to dismiss music download monopoly claims
by Harry Oldfield
Apple Inc has asked a federal judge to dismiss a customer antitrust lawsuit which claims that the company limited consumer choice by linking downloaded iPod music to its iTunes music store.
An attorney for California-based company Cupertino, Robert Mittelstaedt, told US District Judge James Ware in the Californian city of San Jose that preventing iPod music downloads which used competitors’ software was meant to improve the quality of downloading for customers of iTunes.
Changes carried out by Apple in 2004, just days after the announcement by internet software firm RealNetworks Inc of a technology enabling tracks from its online music store to be transferred onto iPods, weren’t anticompetitive, said Mittelstaedt.
He went on to say during the hearing that Apple’s opinion is that iPods can work better when consumers apply the iTunes jukebox instead of third party software which can cause corruption as well as other problems.
Apple claimed that 58 consumer downloading complaints were the reason behind its decision to make improvements to iPods in order to ensure other companies’ downloads could not work with the portable devices. When Ware asked if Apple had attempted to confirm by carrying out scientific tests whether downloads from other companies were the true cause of the complaints, Mittelstaedt said that the company had done no such tests.
One of the lawyers representing customers of iTunes who sued, Bonny Sweeney, said that the plaintiffs were not able to find any legacy software which would allow them to carry out accurate tests, prompting the judge to say that a trial could turn into a battle of experts.
Ware stated that he would rule by May regarding the request to have the case dismissed. Digital music files, which were offered on iTunes, were available to purchase without proprietary software by March 2009, according to court records.
Chief executive officer and co-founder of Apple, Steve Jobs, who was ordered by a different judge to respond to questions in the trial, met with plaintiff attorneys on 12 April for a deposition, said Sweeney yesterday. She declined to make any further comment.
Jobs took medical leave from Apple beginning on 17 January. The CEO, who has been fighting cancer, has been away from work due to medical reasons three times over the last seven years.
Our Stories
- Sandwich labels misleading shoppers
- Unemployment drops unexpectedly but worse still to come
- Tesco store managers see annual bonuses cut
- Royal Mail: half London sorting office to be sold
- Panasonic announces £3.4bn loss
- Thomas Cook attacks government over holidays at home promotion
- Clinton Cards falls into administration
- Wet April sees high street spending fall
- Five tough years ahead for UK jobs market
- Deal struck to save Thomas Cook
- Discount battle leads to sales decline at Morrisons
- Wetherspoon founder: pubs plans to be hit by taxes
Popular Topics
afghanistan al qaeda amazon Apple ASDA bank of england barack obama BBC british airways china david cameron Debenhams Egypt facebook george osborne Google India ipad iphone ivory coast japan Libya London M&S Marks & Spencer Morrisons nhs North Korea Office for National Statistics pakistan protests russia Sainsbury’s South Korea terrorism Tesco Tunisia UK UK retailers UK retail news UK shopping us Waitrose Wikileaks x factorArchive
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- January 2009



